I have made some moderate changes to the article (in addition to adding a bit of content), mostly in order to remove the weasel words. Also re added the guild wars links and the external sources links.
I'm removing the NPOV tag on the article, weasel tag already raises the neutrality issue so there is no need to spam with Wiki templates :) If someone purges the article of weasel words and still doubts a NPOV violation, feel free to add it back. Even more, I'll pretty much remove that section alltogether. I will now go ahead and prune the "References in Previous Games" section. Oh, and indeed it wasn't me who added the npov tag. :) - Tetris L - 195.33.166.40 09:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC) More than 10 days later, nothing happened, nobody commented. I'll hold back doing it myself, because I'm not a Wikipedia regular, but it is still my strong belief that the section should be removed if neutrality and objectivity means anything on Wikipedia. But that's the key point of this whole section, isn't it? Which makes the whole section void, IMO. It's only the connection between Elona and GW3 that's downright made up. So, I shouldn't have said "Anything is downright made up.". However, the section lacks any evidence whatsever that Elona is linked to GW campaign 3 in any way. The section "References in Previous Games" is a nice write-up about Elona, and I don't question the correctness of the ingame quotes. For the record, according to the history, the user that applied the second section NPOV had a different IP address than Tetris L. It's not a real measure for validating the insertion of a wiki entry. As for " many players", I could post conjecture from my guild and claim that the opinion of many. You could just as easilly argue that any of the prior cultures represented and mentioned in the Crystal Desert could be in C3.